GLK19264-7T-1U returns incorrect size on download command

LK/ELK/VK/PK/OK/MX/GLK/EGLK/GVK/GLT Series

Moderators: Henry, Mods

Post Reply
dr21702
LCD?
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:35 am

GLK19264-7T-1U returns incorrect size on download command

Post by dr21702 »

Hello,
I have encountered what appears to a bug with the download command on the GLK19264-7T-1U.

According to the documentation, the download command (0xFE, 0xB2), should return a 4 byte size followed by the bytes of the file, however whenever I use this command to first byte (MSB) of the size always comes back as 1 everytime.

For example the first built in font on the GLK has a size of 904 bytes. When I issue the download command I get the byte sequence of 1, 3, 0, 0 followed by the 904 bytes of the file. The second byte is correct, but the first byte should 0x88, not 1, as 0x388 = 904.

I've been working around it by using the file directory command (0xFE, 0xB3) which does return the correct file sizes.

Any ideas on what I might be doing wrong, or could this be a bug? I thought this might be a communications problem but I am getting all the bytes of the download correctly as the bitmaps from the data are all good, and other commands all work as expected.

Raquel
Matrix Orbital
Matrix Orbital
Posts: 805
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:37 pm
Location: MO Office

Post by Raquel »

Hi dr21702,

Thank you for posting on the forum.

I will try and reproduce what you found and get back to you.

edit:
I have reproduced the problem; and you are right; it IS a bug. I have already found the culprit and will now look more closely and test. Once deemed good, we will release a firmware update.

I also checked the file directory command, it does represent the correct length; so yes please, for now use this as a work around.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Thanks,
Raquel Malinis
Design and Development
Matrix Orbital

dr21702
LCD?
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:35 am

Post by dr21702 »

Raquel wrote:Hi dr21702,

Thank you for posting on the forum.

I will try and reproduce what you found and get back to you.

edit:
I have reproduced the problem; and you are right; it IS a bug. I have already found the culprit and will now look more closely and test. Once deemed good, we will release a firmware update.

I also checked the file directory command, it does represent the correct length; so yes please, for now use this as a work around.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Thanks,
Thank you for your help, I'll keep an out for the firmware update.

Post Reply